Update: July 9, 2008
The Senate passes the FISA bill 69 - 28.
An editorial in todays New York Times describes the act.
"This bill was not a compromise, as the spinners would have it. It was a bad bill. Period. Democrats who voted for it did so primarily because they were afraid to vote against a national security bill in an election year."
Only 28 Senators acted with the courage that deserves reelection:
Akaka (D-HI)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Clinton (D-NY)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Menendez (D-NJ)
FISA Amendments Act of 2008
As the controversy swirls - most of us don't know what the Senate will actually be voting on. The FISA bill has two problems - both at the core of the bill.
Protection from foreign terrorists
The first problem is at the heart of the bill - security. Unfortunately, if the bill is passed by the Senate, you and I will have no right to privacy in electronic communications. The government will always be able to claim that they were trying to prevent a terrorist threat. The current law already allows the U.S. government to intercept communications (thought to be) between a domestic source and a foreign intelligence agent outside the United States, it can petition the Foreign Intelligence Security Court ("FISC") for a FISA warrant - either prior to implementing a wiretap or after the fact. You'd think that an overhaul of FISA would make us safer. Au contraire! The New Act- expands the governments ability to (indirectly) spy on U.S. citizens if it can reasonably claim that the true target of the surveillance in question is a foreign party located abroad but
- actually restricts the government's ability to target Americans that happen to be living or working overseas.)
